Victims of bad drugs and defective prescription medication are seeking reliable and informative information about defective drug lawsuits. Big pharma has decided that corporate profits supersede patient safety. Victims of dangerous drugs need to hire the best bad drug law firms to seek compensation though a defective drug lawsuit. Below are some of the drugs currently subject to defective drug litigation.
This legal defects blog authored by a personal injury attorney seeks to inform the public of the dangerous of unsafe medication and dangerous prescriptions (RX). Contact us if you seek justice by way of a defective drug lawsuit.
It is imperative that victims of defective medication and defective medical devices do not miss a state statute of limitations. If a medical device victims misses a deadline to file a product liability lawsuit, the victim will be forever precluded from compensation or justice. In most states there is a discovery rule which could extend a statute of limitations. In those cases the defective drug lawsuit statute of limitations begins when a victim knew or should have known through reasonable diligence of his or her potential claim.
- Zoloft” https://www.enjuris.com/pharmaceutical-liability/defective-drugs.html
This medical device and defective drug information portal provides information about defective and unsafe medical devices such as :
- hernia mesh
- IVC Filters
- Metal hip replacement
- laparoscopic power morcellation
Medtronic Sprint Fidelis Defibrillator Leads
If you received a devastating diagnosis of asbestos-related disease you need to seek a top asbestos and mesothelioma lawyer.
- lung cancer
“Pharmaceutical companies earn tremendously high profits. For example, the Pfizer made $245 billion between 2004 and 2008. Eli Lily made $36 billion during the same period from just one drug (Zyprexa). By comparison, the fines paid out by the biggest drug companies was only around $7 billion between 2004 and 2010.” RX Dangers
- Asbestos and asbestos exposure
- Asbestos-related Diseases
legal case provides details about the knowledge that the Johnson & Johnson company had regarding the risk of talc-based baby powder and its link to ovarian Cancer. That knowledge may go back as far as 1971. At the crux of this health safety issues is the fact that the company continued to market baby powder specifically to women, including its popular Shower-to-Shower product, when they potentially knew there was an increased risk of ovarian cancer connected with the use of talc-based products by women.” RX Dangers